Read Editorial with D2G ep – XXXXIX

In Read Editorial With D2G
January 13, 2016

OOD MORNING FOLKS! IT’S A TEA TIME AND WE ARE HERE WITH OUR NEW ENDEAVOR – “READ EDITORIAL WITH D2G”. SO FRESHEN YOUR EYES, PUT YOUR PILLOWS BACK AND TAKE A SIP OF YOUR TEA WHILE ENJOYING THIS SHORT PIECE OF A NOTE.

EPISODE – XXXXIX
TOPIC: Jallikattu: A political misadventure
BLOG: The Hindu
WRITER: Editorial
GENRE: Opinion

editorial

READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.

MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC

Political opportunism (If you refer to someone’s behaviour as opportunism, you are criticizing them for taking advantage of any opportunity that occurs in order to gain money or power, without thinking about whether their actions are right or wrong) in an election year often takes the form of dubious (questionable) actions by the executive, and inevitably runs into a judicial barrier. By staying the Union government’s recent notification aimed at permitting jallikattu, the popular bull-taming sport in Tamil Nadu, along with bullock cart races in some other States, the Supreme Court has stopped the Centre’s needless misadventure (unfortunate incidents) in its tracks. The festivities associated with the harvest festival of Pongal in Tamil Nadu went off without jallikattu in 2015 after the Supreme Court’s May 2014 judgment prohibiting the sport on the ground that it perpetrates (commit) cruelty on animals and endangers the lives of the participants. The State government ensured peace and prevented any unrest last year, despite considerable unease and anger among the rural population. There is no reason why it could not have continued to practise the same restraint and wisdom in accepting the court verdict. On the contrary, the issue became politicised in the run-up to the Assembly election that is due in a few months from now. Political parties stoked popular sentiment in favour of reviving jallikattu by demanding measures to circumvent (If someone circumvents a rule or restriction, they avoid having to obey the rule or restriction, in a clever and perhaps dishonest way) the judicial bar. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party at the Centre, looking to find a foothold in the political fray in Tamil Nadu, made a calculated move by amending a 2011 notification that prevented bulls from being exhibited or trained as performing animals, by exempting bulls deployed in jallikattu and cart-racing from its purview. The party will now have to live with the criticism that it knew that the notification would be stayed, and all it was looking for was some political capital.

The Centre will have to explain why it tried to get around a court verdict through a mere executive notification, when it is common knowledge that it can be done only through legislation that removes the basis for the judgment and not merely by tweaking (If you tweak something such as a system or a design, you improve it by making a slight change) some regulations. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa has now urged the Centre to promulgate (publicly approved) an ordinance to save the traditional sport, but even that may be no solution. The law laid down by the Supreme Court is fortified (to make something stronger) by several legal formulations. In a harmonious reading of animal rights in the context of the Universal Declaration of Animal Welfare (UDAW), the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and the Constitution, the court has ruled that animals have a right against human beings inflicting unnecessary pain and suffering on them. In effect, the entire sport has been declared violative of the law against cruelty. Treating animals in a humane (act that is kind and sympathetic), non-exploitative way is now a constitutional requirement for any executive action related to them. The State’s earlier regulatory Act on jallikattu was dismissed as an anthropocentric law that was repugnant (If you think that something is horrible and disgusting, you can say that it is repugnant) to the eco-centric law against cruelty to animals. Instead of continuing this artificial confrontation between tradition and modern law, Tamil Nadu would do well to stop spearheading (If someone spearheads a campaign or an attack, they lead it) the cause of jallikattu, which is but a relic (If you refer to something or someone as a relic of an earlier period, you mean that they belonged to that period but have survived into the present) of a feudal past (Feudalism was a system in which people were given land and protection by people of higher rank, and worked and fought for them in return).