Read Editorial with D2G – Ep LXXXIII

In Read Editorial With D2G
February 19, 2016

WELCOME TO THE NEXT EPISODE OF READ EDITORIAL WITH D2G. IF YOU THINK READING EDITORIAL IS A BORING AND YOU CANT READ IT – YOU ARE WRONG. READ THE EDITORIAL NOW IN UNIQUE WAY – THE D2G’S WAY. READ IT AND FEEL THE CHANGE.

EPISODE – LXXXIII
TOPIC: Right step on savings schemes
BLOG: The Hindu
WRITER: The Editorial
GENRE: Opinion

editorialnew

READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.

NOTE : READ THE EDITORIAL TWICE or THRICE & UNDERSTAND EVERY WORD CLEARLY.

The 25-basis points reduction in interest rates on short-tenure (period) small savings schemes from April 1 may have come as a huge disappointment for countless savers. For the middle class, especially for millions of retired persons, these schemes are risk-free, and provide safe parking slots for their hard-earned money. The returns these schemes offer also help them balance their budget. Read in this light, the decision to pare (reduce (something) in size, extent, or quantity in a number of small successive stages) the interest rates on these schemes, even if only by a small measure, is bound to put the National Democratic Alliance government at the Centre in an uncomfortable position vis-à-vis a crucial component of society, the middle class, which is considered the core constituency of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

The decision, however, must be viewed in the context of the big picture that is emerging (come out) on the national economy. The Reserve Bank of India cut the key policy rate by a total of 125 basis points in 2015, and it has only been partially transmitted to end-borrowers. In fact, a little less than half of this reduction had been passed on by banks to their clients. The problem, in a way, lies in the peculiar predicament (unpleasant or embarrassing situation) the banks find themselves in. It is easy to put banks on the mat for not passing on the rate reduction to customers.

Already under huge stress, they can do so only if they could correspondingly cut their deposit rates. But there is a catch here. The deposit mobilisation (to organize or prepare something) exercise of banks often encounters competition from these small savings schemes. By reducing the interest rates on short-term savings schemes, the government has sought to erase the ‘return advantage’ they currently enjoy over similar-tenure government securities. Indeed, it has set the stage for a uniform interest rate regime — at least from a short-term perspective (viewpoint) — and cleared a major roadblock (a hindrance or obstruction) for banks in cutting their deposit rates, and eventually (in the end or especially after a long delay) the lending rates as well. Viewed from this perspective, the move is a welcome one.

By leaving the interest rates on long-term and certain special category savings schemes unchanged, the government has sent out the message that it has in mind the larger good of society as a whole, and that it is keen to encourage people to save for the future. A distorted (giving a misleading or false account or impression) interest regime is the principal cause for driving the economy into a costlier zone. For individuals, no doubt, the impact of the interest rate cut on small savings schemes could be immediate and visible in terms of lower returns on their savings. However, the effect of such a cut will have a cascading (descend) effect on the entire value chain, and will inevitably (as is certain to happen) bring the cost structure down for the economy. Surely, that is the right way to go. The government has indeed (certainly) done well to take this less-than-popular step.

Article taken from The Hindu