Read Editorial with D2G – Ep CXXXXIX

In Read Editorial With D2G
May 22, 2016

THE MESSAGE FROM WEST BENGAL

READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
 D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.

MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC

The Red disaster has drawn the spotlight away from the Green splash in West Bengal, and recriminations (Recriminations are accusations that two people or groups make about each other – आरोप ) in the Communist Party of India (Marxist) are ringing louder than celebrations in the Trinamool Congress. The verdict has expectedly opened old, unresolved debates in the CPI(M). The decision of the State unit of the party to forge a seat-sharing agreement with the Congress was taken against the central leadership’s firm reservations, and the air is already thick with both misgivings and excuse-making. It is not clear if the party will take away from its West Bengal disaster lessons of theory, praxis (accepted practice or custom – अमल ) or realpolitik — or none at all. But on a larger canvas, the election result suggests significant messages from the electorate. Indeed, these messages could be projected nationwide. For one, the electorate has again rejected the politics of cynicism (Cynicism is the belief that people always act selfishly – सनक ).

Voters have showed that they couldn’t care for an alliance that is scared to even utter its own name. The Congress-CPI(M) seat-sharing was referred to as jot in Bengali, but quibbles (When people quibble over a small matter, they argue about it even though it is not important – शब्दश्लेष ) about its definition gave away the lack of conviction in the two parties for it to be anything but an expedient (An expedient is an action that achieves a particular purpose, but may not be morally right – फ़ायदेमंद ) measure, with no positive outreach. Left Front chairman Biman Bose would say in interviews that it was not an “alliance”, simply seat-sharing. It is impossible to say after the event whether the Left-Congress combine would have got more seats had they gone to voters with a common minimum agenda, and levelled with voters on the obvious contradiction about facing each other down in the Kerala elections. But certainly, the Left would not have found itself floundering (If something is floundering, it has many problems and may soon fail completely – अशुद्धि करना ) to give an honest account of itself, as it is today.

The fact, however, is that the West Bengal elections were not lost by the Left Front and Congress. They were won by the Trinamool Congress. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee went back to the people with a firmness of conviction. She owned the record of her five years in office. Elections in India, especially at the State level, now pivot less on anti-incumbency. With the increased focus on development and delivery of essential services over the last two decades, incumbency (An incumbent is someone who holds an official post at a particular time – पदग्राही ) is not always a disadvantage. Governments that defend their record, that do not get squeamish (If you are squeamish, you are easily upset by unpleasant sights or situations – नकचढ़ा ) about taking on election-time charges flying their way, are usually unbeatable. Ms. Banerjee won West Bengal in 2011 when the Left Front had its back to the wall. She has retained it, now in 2016, by knitting together a welfare politics that not only borrows freely from the Left’s economic agenda, but also customises outreach — Rs.2 per kg rice, cycles for students, stipends for young women who continue their studies, recruitment of special police constables from the Maoist belt of Jangalmahal, recreation facilities, and so on. This has left Ms. Banerjee’s government struggling with a debt-GDP ratio of 35.5 per cent. But her opponents were not exactly cornering her on that.