GOOD MORNING FOLKS! IT’S A TEA TIME AND WE ARE HERE WITH OUR NEW ENDEAVOR – “READ EDITORIAL WITH D2G”. SO FRESHEN YOUR EYES, PUT YOUR PILLOWS BACK AND TAKE A SIP OF YOUR TEA WHILE ENJOYING THIS SHORT PIECE OF A NOTE.
EPISODE – CVII
TOPIC: The challenge in Jammu & Kashmir
BLOG: The Hindu
WRITER: Editorial
GENRE: Politics
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC
Of late, political uncertainty has hit some of India’s strategically significant border States — Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh. Of these, J&K is undoubtedly the most sensitive State, where the Government of India has bled (Bled is the past tense and past participle of bleed) physically and financially for over 25 years to stop the separatist discourse and bring its people back to the political mainstream. But the demise (The demise of something or someone is their end or death) of Chief Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed in early January culminated in a political crisis as the two coalition (A coalition is a government consisting of people from two or more political parties) partners, the Peoples Democratic Party and the Bharatiya Janata Party, fell out, with the former accusing the latter of not abiding by the “Agenda of Alliance”, the goodwill treaty that had brought them together. Last week, the hope of such a coalition government emerging was renewed when Mehbooba Mufti, who is deemed a natural political successor to her father, met BJP president Amit Shah in Delhi. The meeting only resulted in further estrangement and left one big question: will the BJP be able to give Ms. Mufti what she wants? So far, she has declared the Mufti’s decision to join hands with the BJP an “unpopular” choice, but she has been vague when it comes to explaining where the BJP has gone wrong with the Agenda of Alliance. The BJP has not been forthright (If you describe someone as forthright, you admire them because they show clearly and strongly what they think and feel) enough either. It is unclear what the party would or would not seek to deliver under the Agenda. For the Centre, governing Jammu and Kashmir has not been easy, not even in the post-insurgency era. Previous governments led by the BJP or Congress, backed governments in the State by making efforts to fill its budget deficits, fix its battered infrastructure and skilfully tackle separatist elements.
The three successive governments in post-insurgency Kashmir could only function when they had the Centre’s backing. In the early 2000s, the decision of the Vajpayee government to allow cross-LoC trade and travel, enter into bilateral engagement with Pakistan, and talk to Kashmiri separatists on the side, not only increased voter confidence but also brought the mainstream discourse (Discourse is spoken or written communication between people, especially serious discussion of a particular subject) back to the Valley. A decade later, with the arrival of the PDP-BJP coalition government, a similar approach was expected. But the State seems to be vulnerable again, with the number of militant strikes increasing and the absence of a civilian government furthering political alienation. For the BJP, the need of the hour is to work out an alliance with the PDP and scuttle (When people or small animals scuttle somewhere, they run there with short quick steps) any attempts to subvert (To subvert something means to destroy its power and influence) Ms. Mufti within her party through undemocratic means, such as horse-trading. It is equally important to cultivate a strong mainstream leadership in the State by giving politicians like her the space to bargain with the Centre within the constitutional framework. Therefore, the BJP must not use the government at the Centre to make political gains in Jammu and Kashmir. It should revisit the Agenda of Alliance and also set the terms of the Agenda in concrete terms. If that does not work, it should simply go for new elections. Any undemocratic attempt to break the deadlock could have larger ramifications.
***************
TEST YOUR SKILLS
SYNONYM
DEMISE
a) Start
b) Success
c) Ruin
d) Creation
COALITION
a) Compact
b) Division
c) Parting
d) Divorce
FORTHRIGHT
a) Secret
b) Candid
c) Devious
d) Tricky
SCUTTLE
a) Abandon
b) Sink
c) Submerge
d) Any of he above
SUBVERT
a) Straighten
b) Build
c) Create
d) Extinguish