Sri Lanka has not done enough to usher in reform and reconciliation since 2009
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED: D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
Meanings are given in Bold
Is one decade of peace enough to undo the devastating (highly destructive or damaging) effects of a civil war that lasted nearly three decades (a period of ten years)? As Sri Lanka completes 10 years since the brutal and decisive (major or important) war against Tamil militants came to an end, it must be acknowledged that the country has not achieved much tangible (real or noticeable) progress towards ethnic reconciliation (the restoration of friendly relations), accountability for war-time excesses and constitutional reform that includes a political solution.
The fruits of peace are limited to the revival of economic activity, but the pervasive (extensive) grievances of the Tamil minority remain. Some progress has been made in resettlement and rehabilitation, but complaints abound (exist in large numbers or amounts). Many say their land continues to be held by the military, which also controls huge swathes (a broad strip or area of something) of state-owned land. Preliminary steps were taken towards forging (creating) a new Constitution, but the process seems to be at a standstill. There is no sense of closure for families affected by the disappearance of thousands over the years.
The creation of an ‘Office on Missing Persons’ has not inspired enough confidence. There is no mechanism to secure justice for those massacred in the closing stages of the war. What continues is the fractious (irritable and quarrelsome) politics of leaders of the national parties. Jockeying (struggle by every available means to gain or achieve something) for power has overshadowed the promise of good governance, economic growth and a push towards a constitutional settlement.
Half the period since the end of the war was marked by triumphalism (excessive exultation over one’s success or achievements) and also warding off international pressure for an inquiry into possible war crimes. The year 2015 brought to power a new regime (a government, especially an authoritarian one), a fresh promise of democratic governance, and the infusion of a spirit of political and constitutional reform. Any reckoning (the action or process of calculating or estimating something) at the end of 10 years would possibly have been marked by a tabulation of peace-time gains and failures. However, a month ago everything changed. The Easter Sunday bombings have taken the country back to the time when terrorism was the dominant theme. This time, there is no real ‘underlying cause’ to address; no group or organisation to talk to; and no tangible political grievances to redress.
The serial blasts, executed by fanatical (obsessively concerned with something) elements apparently inspired by the Islamic State, may be a flashpoint for a fresh round of inter-ethnic and inter-religious tension. Already there was some indication last week when Sinhala mobs attacked predominantly Muslim villages in waves, destroying property and threatening the people. Anti-terrorism laws and emergency regulations are back in full measure. The biggest adverse fallout is that a new dimension has been given to inter-ethnic suspicions that may deepen distrust among communities.
As prospects of accountability for past crimes and constitutional reform recede, some sections, including the incumbent (currently holding office) regime, may believe economic development may be enough to propel the country forward. But when tensions persist among communities, nothing can make up for the absence of reconciliation and trust among all sections. Never has Sri Lanka needed a shared sense of nationhood among all its peoples more than it does now.
Source: The Hindu
