Read Editorial With D2G (Ep 357)

In Read Editorial With D2G
November 20, 2017

Search, seize, cease: on I-T raids at Jayalalithaa’s residence (11/20/2017)

READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.

Read Editorial

MEANINGS are given in BOLD

In Tamil Nadu’s politically surcharged (an additional charge) atmosphere, almost everything takes on a political hue. Searches and seizures (the action of capturing something using force) by the Income Tax department following the death of Chief Minister Jayalalithaa were without doubt integral to the clean-up operation in a State known for brazen (shameless) corruption and abuse of power at different levels. But some of the actions of the enforcement agencies have given the impression that they are selective in nature, leading to charges that they were motivated by the political interests of the Bharatiya Janata Party, which heads the government at the Centre.

In the latest instance (occurrence or case), Income Tax officials searched the residence of Jayalalithaa, following up on seizures made at properties held by the family of her friend V.K. Sasikala. But curiously (in a strange and unusual way), Income Tax officials were insistent (determined) that the rooms used by Jayalalithaa were not the object of inquiry, only those used by Sasikala and secretary S. Poongundran. Jayalalithaa remains a revered (respect) figure in Tamil Nadu’s politics, and the BJP’s efforts over the last several months have been two-fold: to acknowledge her political legacy and to denounce (publicly declare to be wrong or evil) the claims of the Sasikala family as its true inheritor. Not surprisingly, in an attempt to undermine the BJP’s control of the narrative, Sasikala’s nephew, T.T.V. Dhinakaran, described the searches as an assault on Jayalalithaa’s soul. The credibility of the searches thus hinges on the Income Tax department widening the net beyond the Sasikala family and cracking down on corruption at the highest levels.

Adding to the credibility (the quality of being trusted and believed in) issue is the evident lack of serious follow-up on searches made earlier. Within weeks of Jayalalithaa’s death, Income Tax officials conducted searches against the then Chief Secretary, P. Rama Mohana Rao, and claimed to have unearthed assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. But almost a year later, there is little forward movement in the case. Similarly, searches at the properties of Health Minister C. Vijaya Baskar, a confidant of Mr. Dhinakaran, have yielded little in terms of framing of charges. Mr. Baskar remains a Minister, but he is a little warier (cautious) of associating openly with Mr. Dhinakaran. The political impact of the searches is infinitely greater than their legal consequences.

Both factions (a small organized dissenting group within a larger one, especially in politics) of the AIADMK seem eager to please the BJP, which does not have much more than a toehold (a relatively insignificant position from which further progress may be made) in the State. In the absence of the searches resulting in serious action, the Central enforcement agencies will appear as no more than political weapons in the hands of the BJP. Widening the scope of and deepening the probe consequent to the searches are essential for taking the drive against political corruption to its logical end. Just as important, however, is the need for enforcement agencies to demonstrate their independence and credibility.