Midnight makeover: adoption of GST
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED: D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD
In a landmark reform, India today switches to a new indirect tax system, the Goods and Services Tax. The GST subsumes ( include or absorb (something) in something else) the multiple Central, State and local taxes and cesses (tax) levied (impose; charge) on goods and services, unifying the country into a single market, thereby making it easier to do business and ensure tax compliance. This will attract investors and more efficiently mop up (dispatch; eliminate) revenues for the exchequer. The reform has been years in the making, and having shown the political will to finally pull it off, the Central government must work with the States to chart a road map to simplify the tax regime. Currently there are multiple tax rates ranging from 0% to 28%, plus a cess on some products, creating incentives for lobbying (seek to influence (a legislator) on an issue.) and rent-seeking.
The level of preparedness for the new tax system too is not optimal (best or most favorable), with sections of industry, trade as well as the bureaucracy visibly anxious (worried) about several aspects of the GST’s operational and legal framework. In response, the date for businesses to file the first GST returns has been deferred (postponed; delay). The generation of e-way bills for moving goods worth over ₹50,000 too has been put on hold, along with the requirement for e-commerce portals to deduct tax at source from small sellers. The GST Network, which will digitally capture billions of transactions daily, was not able to test its software in advance; and there is concern about the preparedness of intermediaries mandated to help businesses transition to the completely electronic compliance system.
The coming days therefore could test the system, and the capacity of the authorities to think on their feet will be vital. As it stands, the GST in its initial avatar has a complicated structure, with far too many tax rates that could lead to classification disputes, and with the exclusion of key inputs such as petroleum products (with particularly high indirect tax levies). The Finance Minister has asked industry to ensure that the benefits of GST rate cuts are passed on to consumers, but it is not clear how businesses with higher tax incidence are to adjust pricing strategies or how the stringent (strict; firm) anti-profiteering clauses will be interpreted. The transitory effects on India’s largely informal economy, which has already been hit by demonetisation, must be watched closely.
Tax buoyancy (indicator to measure efficiency and responsiveness of revenue mobilization in response to growth in the Gross domestic product or National income), an easier investment climate and the 1% to 2% growth spurt (gush out in a sudden and forceful stream.) expected from GST may take some time to be realised. Yet, reforms are the art of the possible and the government has said it will strive to rationalise the number of tax rates and bring excluded sectors into the GST over time. This is the first step in the evolution of the GST, and some initial hiccups are perhaps inevitable in a system founded on political consensus and federal adjustments. This is why it is unfortunate that some opposition parties, including the Congress which led the initiative on the GST for much of the past decade, decided to boycott (avoid; stay away from) the midnight inauguration in Parliament’s Central Hall.
Also Read :
Read Editorial – A welcome sale: Air India disinvestment
Read Editorial – Being smart about Smart Cities Mission
Read Editorial – Kumble’s farewell: On Team India coach exit
Read Editorial – The rot in farming