Read Editorial with D2G – Ep (331)

In Read Editorial With D2G
June 12, 2017

Pragmatic step: Kerala’s new liquor policy

READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.

MEANINGS are given in BOLD

The Kerala government’s new liquor policy is a pragmatic (dealing with things sensibly) step that may help boost its revenue and retrieve (recover) lost ground in the tourism sector. More important, it will end the discrimination (unfairness) in favour of five-star hotels. Kerala’s erstwhile (former) United Democratic Front government had restricted bar permits to five-star hotels alone, resulting in more than 700 hotels of other categories losing their bar licences. Under the new policy, hotels in the three- and four-star category may also have bars that serve Indian Made Foreign Liquor. Two-star hotels are permitted to serve wine and beer.

At the same time, the Left Democratic Front government in the State has sought to give a boost to the traditional toddy (the naturally alcoholic sap of some kinds of palm, used as a beverage in tropical countries) business by allowing hotel bars to sell toddy too. To partially offset criticism, it has raised the legal drinking age from 21 to 23. The new excise policy is, of course, no surprise as the LDF election manifesto had made it clear that it does not favour prohibition (ban) and would rather emphasise (highlight) on voluntary abstinence (the practice of restraining oneself from indulging in something).

In a State that has a high per capita alcohol consumption, there is a case for a vigorous (healthy) campaign about the ill-effects of being addicted to alcohol, as opposed to one that makes liquor scarce (insufficient) and encourages bootlegging (make, distribute, or sell (alcoholic drink or a recording) illegally). The government has waited for a year before unveiling (disclosing) the changes it wanted, lest (to avoid the risk of) it be seen as acting in undue (excessive) haste. Politically, the LDF is on firm ground. The UDF regime’s hardline liquor policy was the result of an internal game of one-upmanship between factions, and that decision did not help it return to power.

Some opposition to the new policy is expected from influential religious groups as well as opposition parties. Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has justified his decision to liberalise the sector by describing the earlier policy, which had received the Supreme Court’s approbation (approval) as well, as a ‘fiasco’ (a complete failure), as the restrictions on the sale of liquor had brought down tourism traffic, caused job losses and led to a spike in drug abuse. He will now have to ensure that the purported positive outcomes, such as revitalising (renew) the tourism sector and the hotel industry, boosting employment and ending the brewing of hooch (illicit whisky) are actualised (make a reality of) on the ground.

The big challenge lies in pursuing (to continue) this policy without violating the Supreme Court’s ban on having liquor outlets within 500 metres of national and State highways. News that a 1983 document of the Indian Roads Congress has said all highways automatically become arterial roads or sub-arterial roads while passing through urban areas gives a new dimension to the highway ban. State governments may now consider examining this aspect to get the Supreme Court to relax its highway ban in respect of hotels located within towns and cities. As protests mount against relocating bars from highways to interior residential areas, the situation calls for a pragmatic and holistic solution.

Also Read :

Read Editorial – Where the jobs are: on the unemployment rate