When India and Pakistan announced in November they would operationalise a corridor from Dera Baba Nanak in Punjab to Kartarpur Sahib Gurdwara in Pakistan’s Punjab, it was hailed (Beat forcely) as a step forward in an otherwise fraught (causing or affected by anxiety or stress) relationship. Prime Minister Narendra Modi appeared to share the optimism when he likened the initiative’s potential to the fall of the Berlin Wall. What has followed, however, is round upon round of wrangling ( engagement in a long, complicated dispute or argument) between the two governments over every detail: from the number of pilgrims ( worshiper ; Devotee) to be accommodated, to the security restrictions, to the documentation and mode of transport to be used by pilgrims.

At the base of the differences is the deep distrust between the two governments, a chasm that has deepened in the aftermath (the consequences or after-effects of a significant unpleasant event) of the Pulwama attack and the Balakot strike. Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s administration feels it should be given more credit for having cleared the Kartarpur proposal, something Indian Sikh pilgrims have demanded for decades, ever since the Radcliffe Line left their sacred shrine on the other side of the border in 1947.

For its part, New Delhi refuses to acknowledge Pakistan’s overture (an introduction to something more substantial or approach), and has made it clear the corridor will have no connection with furthering bilateral talks on other issues. Meanwhile, security agencies have voiced concerns about a possible attempt by Pakistan’s military establishment to use the corridor to fuel separatist Khalistani sentiment. The Modi government’s decision now to postpone the next round of technical talks, which were scheduled for April 2, is driven mainly by those concerns, in particular the inclusion of some known Khalistan activists in a gurdwara committee that would interact with pilgrims from India.

Last week, the Ministry of External Affairs summoned (order (someone) to be present) Pakistan’s Deputy High Commissioner and sought (attempt to find (something)) clarifications on the “controversial elements” on the committee, and said the next meeting would only be held after it receives Pakistan’s response.While none of the government’s concerns is unwarranted, it could not have been unprepared when it embarked (begin (a course of action)) on the corridor proposal. Pakistan’s support to separatist Sikh groups goes back several decades, and India must work to secure its border from the threat even as it opens the gates for thousands of pilgrims to travel to Pakistan. National security must get priority.

But for this, there must be an effort by all stakeholders in India — the Centre, the State government and the leadership of the BJP, the Akalis and the Congress — to resist (struggle or fight back when attacked) scoring political points against one another. Modalities and technical issues, such as on the numbers, eligibility and identity proof required for the trip to Kartarpur Sahib, should be ironed out by both governments. Putting off meetings is hardly a constructive solution, given the proposed opening by November to mark the 550th birth anniversary of Guru Nanak.