The conviction and after
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED: D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC
Corruption in high places is a malaise (a general feeling of discomfort, illness, or unease whose exact cause is difficult to identify) that is easy to diagnose but difficult to cure. Even in the rare cases they are arraigned (call or bring (someone) before a court to answer a criminal charge) before a court, top politicians often pay their way through legal battles, and spend little or no time in incarceration (he state of being confined in prison; imprisonment).
The conviction (opinion : judgement) of AIADMK general secretary V.K. Sasikala in the disproportionate (too large or too small in comparison with something else) assets (a useful or valuable thing or person) case involving her close friend, former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, as the prime accused, is a significant marker in India’s legal and political history. The charges against Jayalalithaa abated following her death last December, but Ms. Sasikala had to face the full wrath (extreme anger) of the Supreme Court, which has upheld the trial court order in toto (in all; overall) , leaving her to spend four years in prison.
As Justice Amitava Roy wrote in his concurring order, “corruption is a vice of insatiable (impossible to satisfy) avarice (extreme greed for wealth or material gain) for self-aggrandisement (the action or process of promoting oneself as being powerful or important) by the unscrupulous (not honest or fair), taking unfair advantage of their power and authority.” While there is no denying that the judgment has strengthened confidence in the justice delivery system, it is mystifying (confuse) that the ruling has come more than eight months after the two-member Bench concluded hearing arguments in the case.
All the more so, since the basic thrust of the judgment only endorsed the position taken by the trial court in Bengaluru, which held all the accused in the case guilty. Given that the Supreme Court had pressed the Karnataka High Court to hear the appeal expeditiously (with speed and efficiency), there was no justification in such an inordinate delay. Politically, this could not have come at a worse time for Ms. Sasikala, who was making a determined bid for power, staking (support) claim to form the government after displacing one-time loyalist O. Panneerselvam. Governor Ch. Vidyasagar Rao had held off inviting Ms. Sasikala to form the government despite her demonstrating the support of a majority of the members of the legislature precisely because he anticipated (expect or predict) such a situation.
Now, however, the options before him are a lot clearer. If the newly elected leader of the AIADMK Legislature Party, Edappadi Palaniswami, is able to show the support of at least 117 MLAs, he will have to be sworn (determined to remain in the role or condition specified) in as Chief Minister. Though there are allegations that the MLAs were kept forcibly at a resort by the Sasikala camp, Mr. Panneerselvam is nowhere close to splitting the AIADMK legislature party despite the support of the rank and file.
Notwithstanding the legal setback, Ms. Sasikala may be able to trump (in bridge) Mr. Panneerselvam politically. But her success in keeping the MLAs together may depend on the Governor’s next move; whatever that is, Tamil Nadu is destined (certain to meet (a particular fate)) for more political churn (make (someone) troubled or nervous).
