WELCOME TO THE NEXT EPISODE OF READ EDITORIAL WITH D2G. IF YOU THINK READING EDITORIAL IS A BORING AND YOU CAN’T READ IT – YOU ARE WRONG. READ THE EDITORIAL NOW IN UNIQUE WAY – THE D2G’S WAY. READ IT AND FEEL THE CHANGE.
EPISODE – XCIII
TOPIC: Looking beyond economic quick-fixes
BLOG: The Hindu
TOPIC: Economy, Business, and Finance
GENRE: Editorial
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
In an all-too-familiar replay, finance ministers and central bank governors of the Group of 20 countries meeting in Shanghai drove home the complexities of formulating a collective response to the persisting (continue in an opinion) global slowdown in growth, even as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) reiterated (repeat) its call for coordinated action at the multilateral level to contain risks to the real economies from market turbulence (violent or unsteady movement). The Fund’s prescription ahead of the gathering, as in the recent past, lays particular stress on fiscal stimulus (a thing or event that evokes a specific functional reaction) measures to boost demand, as against over-reliance on monetary policies.
But the reaction from national capitals was along expected lines. U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew pressed hard a long-standing concern of Washington that China ought to increase domestic consumption and Germany adopt fiscal stimulus. His counterpart (equivalent or peer) in Berlin, Wolfgang Schaeuble, was equally categorical as he ruled out his country’s support for a fiscal stimulus and instead continued to insist on structural reforms as the remedy (solution). Mr. Lew even suggested, ahead of the Shanghai meet, that it may be a case of financial markets misreading the situation on the state of the real economy.
Despite the strong divergence (the process or state of diverging or separation) of perceptions that have long underpinned (support or justify) the group’s overall approach, their promise in Shanghai to refrain (stop oneself from doing something) from a competitive devaluation of currencies to promote exports could go some way to soothe (gently calm) investor sentiment. Such an assurance is significant in the light of the 4 per cent depreciation in the value of the renminbi last year that set off turmoil (a state of great disturbance, confusion, or uncertainty) in global stock markets and a flight of capital from the country. Currency volatilities could continue to pose concerns as emerging economies experienced a slowdown in 2015 — most notably Brazil, and China, which earlier this decade overtook the U.S. as the world’s largest trading nation.
The economic recession (a period of temporary economic decline during which trade and industrial activity are reduced) in Brazil, the worst in over a century, and the combined effects of the collapse of Chinese imports into Latin America, could well have had a significant impact on world trade, which contracted to its lowest since the global financial crisis, according to the World Trade Monitor of the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. Yet, there is good evidence of the G-20’s capacity for concerted action. In 2014, it pledged (commit (a person or organization) by a solemn promise) to take steps to raise the group’s gross domestic product by an additional 2 per cent by 2018. The measures implemented so far would cause an increase of just 0.8 per cent by that deadline.
The current situation should lend (grant) greater urgency not merely to achieve the goal, but to extend the measures into other areas that have been identified for common action. The political engagement from the G-20 in the wake of the 2008 global meltdown (a disastrous collapse or breakdown) was immense (extremely large or great). That resulted in the fiscal stimulus, the stabilisation of the banking sector and the injection of capital into international financial institutions. The rich and emerging economies should summon the resolve (settle or find a solution) and the will to promote a more equitable (fair and impartial) international order.
