READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC
Nothing succeeds like excess. This may well be the belief of the Nitish Kumar government in Bihar, which has passed a stringent (strict, precise, and exacting) law to enforce its total prohibition policy. Prohibition on country-made liquor was imposed on April 1, and within days it was expanded to cover Indian-Made Foreign Liquor.
However, the State has now come up with fresh legislation to supersede (take the place of (a person or thing previously in authority or use); supplant) earlier Acts in a bid to ward off criticism that penal laws and administrative measures do not prevent alcohol consumption. Brushing aside criticism in the Assembly, the government has pushed through a Bill so stringent that the Opposition parties call it draconian ((of laws or their application) excessively harsh and severe).
This cannot be dismissed as the usual criticism of political adversaries (one’s opponent in a contest, conflict, or dispute), as some of the provisions indeed are scarily excessive. The most egregious (outstandingly bad; shocking) one allows action against all adult members of a family if liquor is found on their premises or one of them is suspected to have consumed it. The law presumes that all of them must be aware of the offence until proven otherwise, but essentially this amounts to collective punishment.
Similarly, the owner of any premises in which liquor is stored or consumed is liable for prosecution. With the offences related to consumption, storage and possession of alcohol or any other intoxicant being cognisable (perceptible; clearly identifiable), the sweeping provision could land anyone in jail because of the involvement of one family member, tenant or visitor. The authorities could seal or confiscate the property, and fine a group of people or a village, for repeated transgressions (an act that goes against a law, rule, or code of conduct; an offence).
Of late there has been a populist competition between political parties in moving towards liquor bans in various parts of the country. The growing tendency among State governments to ban liquor in the apparent interest of protecting the public health may appear politically attractive, but it is fraught (causing or affected by anxiety or stress) with practical consequences: fall in revenue, a rise in contraband (illegal or prohibited traffic in goods : smuggling) movement, the formation of mafias and a spike in corruption.
Mr. Kumar argues that the law is effective in its present form as it seeks to plug all loopholes. It also contains safeguards in the form of provisions to punish officials who misuse it. It may appear pointless trying to convince those who are politically committed to prohibition that the step is impractical, unfeasible or illiberal; it is up to them to draw their own lessons from experience.
And from Mr. Kumar’s recent statements it is clear that the promise of prohibition may be his calling card as he tries to extend the political presence of the Janata Dal (United) beyond Bihar. However, the controversial new provisions are unlikely to survive judicial scrutiny (critical observation or examination). Bihar would do well to reconsider them.
#################
