READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED:
D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC
Surprise victories and shock defeats are usually the stuff of the direct elections; much less frequently that of indirect elections to the Rajya Sabha. When elections to the Upper House throw up a surprise, they usually reveal stories of dissension (disagreement that leads to discord) and, on occasion, extraneous influences of a dubious (hesitating or doubting) sort.
The unexpected jolts (push or shake (someone or something) abruptly and roughly) in the last round of Rajya Sabha elections were caused by MLAs in the Congress in Haryana and the Janata Dal (Secular) in Karnataka. Strategies drawn up at the leadership level came to naught (nothing) as the legislators, dissatisfied with the choice of candidates or the style of decision-making, ensured the defeat of official nominees. The Congress high command decided to ignore the early warning signs in Haryana, blinkered (having or showing a narrow or limited outlook) by the overwhelming desire to defeat the independent candidate sponsored by the Bharatiya Janata Party — media baron Subhash Chandra.
For the Haryana unit of the party, the course adopted by its leadership, of joining hands with the Indian National Lok Dal to support the lawyer R.K. Anand, made little political sense as the two parties are fighting for the same political space in the State. In this instance, the interests of the national leadership and those of the State unit were in direct conflict (a serious disagreement or argument).
The Congress high command was more intent on reducing the support for the BJP in the Rajya Sabha, if only by one. But the party’s MLAs were more concerned about how the battle lines are drawn in Haryana. What makes the situation worse for the Congress is that it is in no position to act against the rebels (a person who rises in opposition or armed resistance against an established government or leader).
The 15 MLAs, who very deliberately (consciously and intentionally) invalidated their votes, have the backing of large sections of the State unit, led from the front by former Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda. It is the national leadership of the party that will have to pay heed (pay attention to; take notice of) to this message.
In Karnataka, it was the Congress that was the beneficiary of another party’s internal bickering (argue about petty and trivial matters). Dissidence (protest against official policy) within the JD(S) has a longer history, and the cross-voting had more to do with dissatisfaction with the leadership’s style of functioning than with the choice of candidate.
Although some of the rebels are considered close to Congress Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who was formerly with the JD(S), their vote was largely a signal to the JD(S) leadership, and not so much out of love for the Congress. In Uttar Pradesh, the Congress managed to get Kapil Sibal elected despite some cross-voting in favour of Preeti Mahapatra, a Gujarat-origin entrepreneur considered close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Like in some earlier Rajya Sabha elections, there was evidence in this round of wealthy candidates securing votes across party lines, reinforcing (strengthen or support (an object or substance), especially with additional material) the belief that elections to the Upper House continue to be influenced by the power of money.
#################
