Sri Lanka conquers malaria
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED: D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC
Sri Lanka has become malaria-free. On September 5, the World Health Organisation officially recognised this huge public health achievement. The WHO certifies a country so when the chain of local transmission is interrupted (to disturb or halt an ongoing process) for at least three consecutive years; the last reported case was in October 2012. With no local transmission reported, Sri Lanka’s priority since October 2012 has been to prevent its return from outside, particularly from malaria-endemic (native ; originating where it occurs) countries such as India. There were 95, 49 and 36 cases reported in 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively, all contracted outside Sri Lanka.
In a commendable initiative, Sri Lanka adopted a two-pronged (a projecting part) strategy of targeting both vector and parasite, undertaking active detection of cases and residual parasite carriers by screening populations irrespective of whether malaria symptoms were present.Early detection and treatment of asymptomatic parasite carriers, who serve as reservoirs (a place where anything is kept in store) of infection, played a crucial role in interrupting the chain. While this was achieved by means of house visits and by starting mobile clinics in high-transmission areas, real-time monitoring through effective surveillance (close observation of an individual or group) systems, community awareness and mobilisation ( capable of being moved) also played their role.
The public sector and the private sector were oriented to the common goal of eliminating malaria by enhancing (to raise up ; to improve something by adding features) case notification and achieving 100 per cent detection and confirmation through tests. Sri Lanka expanded the coverage of long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets to protect high-risk populations, and used multiple methods to reduce mosquito numbers.Sri Lanka was close to eliminating malaria in 1963, when it reported just 17 cases. But a premature (taking place earlier than prepared) lowering of the guard and growing resistance (force that tends to oppose motion) to DDT led to rising incidence in the 1980s.
The precise (exact ; accurate) reasons for the failure of the eradication programme were not clear. Some of the major challenges the country had to face before it interrupted local transmission were the Plasmodium falciparum parasite becoming resistant to the chloroquine drug, behavioural changes in the vector, asymptomatic carriers and vector reintroduction. But the tide turned from 2000 when a steady reduction in the number of cases was recorded. Sri Lanka joins the ranks of 34 countries that have been certified malaria-free since the 1960s. The Maldives was certified so in 2015; Argentina and Kyrgyzstan may soon be. Eradication (to destroy completely) of the disease in India remains a challenge, but it could learn some lessons from Sri Lanka even if the scale and complexity of the task is significantly different.
