Uncertain times in London
READ BEFORE YOU PROCEED: D2G wears no responsibility of the views published here by the respective Author. This Editorial is used here for Study Purpose. Students are advised to learn the word-meaning, The Art of Writing Skills and understand the crux of this Editorial.
MEANINGS are given in BOLD and ITALIC
Two months since the seemingly irreversible referendum outcome in Britain, there are more questions than answers about the shape of the country’s future in Europe. Had the electorate (the collective people of a country ,state who are entitled to vote) even remotely sensed the sheer (very thin ; transparent) complexity of the now-impending (approaching ; about to happen) divorce from the European Union, it may have allowed reason to prevail (to be current widespread or predominant) over apprehensions. In the event, practically every single element of the case for Britain staying in the EU, which the Leave camp dismissed as scaremongering (someone who spreads worrying rumours) , has emerged as a very real concern. Conversely, the Brexit mantra of ‘take control’ rings more hollow with each passing day.
Prime Minister Theresa May insists that “Brexit means Brexit”, emphasising at the same time that London would not, until 2017, trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty on leaving the bloc. Even then it is unlikely that the exit procedure will kick in before the French presidential polls next summer and the general elections in Germany a few months later. So, late-2017 is the earliest point that most commentators who believe in the eventuality (a possible event ; something that may happen) of Brexit would hazard for the start of exit negotiations. Indeed, there are many who question even the necessity of carrying the outcome of the referendum to its logical end, since Parliament is not bound by the advisory nature of the popular verdict (an opinion or judgement) .
Meanwhile, in view of the preference shown in the June vote by a majority of Scots to stay in the EU, the mood in Edinburgh clearly favours a second referendum on Scottish independence. Yet, it is becoming apparent that Brexit will raise the economic burden of an independent Scotland since the bulk ofits export revenues accrue (to increase ; to come to by way of increase) from the rest of Britain and not from the bigger bloc of 27 states. Similarly, Northern Ireland is faced with a dilemma (a difficult circumstance or problem) over whether the majority regional sentiment to remain should take precedence over the wider British decision to leave. There is palpable (capable of being touched or handled) disquiet in Belfast and Dublin over the fact that the border-free movement between the north and south of Ireland that followed the historic 1998 Good Friday agreement may be in jeopardy (danger of loss ; failure) following the verdict.
Once London is outside the bloc, the restoration of customs and immigration controls at Newry between Northern Ireland and the Republic would become an inevitable (impossible to avoid ; prevent) reality, with enormous (extremely large ; huge) economic and psychological costs. This sense of uncertainty has gripped the rest of the Union — while central European states are positive about forging (a component that is shaped by heating or hammering) a common identity with the rest of the continent, there is anxiety about the future. The only reassuring thought amid this all-round chaos is that the EU is not unused to balancing such emotions.
